Patent Prep and Prosecution, start to finish
Automate the manual work behind disclosure, drafting, review, and prosecution — and give outside counsel a shorter, cleaner scope.
The same team can absorb more applications and Office Actions instead of more headcount or outside-counsel hours.
Pressure-test claims earlier, learn from prior prosecution, and make better-informed decisions before they become expensive to revisit.
A publicly-traded biotech running Patlytics estimates $5,000–$7,500 saved on every application it files.
Move inventions from R&D to legal without the back-and-forth
- Slides, abstracts, and transcripts turned into structured disclosures
- Sketches transformed into patent figures
- Agent identifies missing information and prompts inventors for what’s needed to complete the disclosure
Legal gets the technical detail it needs sooner, while inventors spend less time translating their work into patent-ready form.
Decide what is worth protecting before you pay to draft it
- Evaluate disclosures against prior art before committing to claim scope
- Structure a claim tree from the disclosure
- Identify the invention’s most defensible elements
- Test alternate claim formulations against the prior art
Resolve the biggest questions early, before they turn into drafting time, prosecution cost, or a filing that never gets granted.
1. A knitted component for an article of footwear, comprising an outer layer (202) and an inner layer.
2. The knitted component of claim 1, wherein the outer layer includes a fused area (204).
3. The knitted component of claim 2, wherein the fused area is water-resistant.
4. The knitted component of claim 3, further comprising raised dimensional structures (206).
“An idea now moves from concept to invention disclosure to draft patent application in hours rather than weeks - and without any outside legal fees.”
Draft in hours. Test claims before filing, while there’s still time to strengthen them.
- Draft claims and specification from the source materials in one click
- Run validity, §112, infringement, and freedom-to-operate checks against the draft itself
- Interpret draft claims with the same claim-construction engine used on issued patents, so you can see how key terms may be read before filing
- Trace each interpretation back to the specification and revise the language while the application is still being shaped
The immediate payoff is a faster draft. The bigger one is catching expensive problems while they are still inexpensive to fix.
Young Basile cut patent application drafting time by 20%.
Get to a filing-ready draft with less manual review
- Flag inconsistent terminology, undefined terms, and claim-dependency errors before final proofreading
- Check generated content against the disclosure, figures, technical materials, and related sources
- Edit claims and specification directly with teammates, with Agent available to check the draft against your standards
Attorney judgment stays in control. The repetitive checking and cleanup takes less of the attorney’s time.
“Putting attorney judgment first and letting targeted automation handle the grunt work helps us move faster without lowering our standards.”
Cut the work behind an Office Action response
- Drop in the Office Action, pending claims, and specification. Patlytics pulls in the cited references and assembles the record.
- Interrogate the rejection with Agent & Skills: test cited prior art against individual claims and limitations, question the examiner’s reasoning, and identify where the art falls short.
- See how similar patents were prosecuted and how the examiner handled previous cases, so prior prosecution can inform the response you make now.
- Develop, test, and edit arguments and amendments in real time, alongside the Office Action, cited art, claims, and specification.
Respond faster, with more context for the decisions that affect allowance and the scope of the resulting patent.
Office action response time cut by 80%.