Patlytics
x
Dickinson Wright
Prepared for 
Dickinson Wright
 · 
August 26, 2026

Increase prosecution capacity. Reduce attorney time per matter.

Patlytics reduces the attorney time required for drafting, research, review, and Office Action responses while keeping attorneys responsible for legal judgment. Firms can increase matter capacity, improve matter economics, and maintain consistent work product.

Increase matter capacity

Complete more prosecution work with the same team.

Reduce attorney time per matter

Reduce time spent on drafting, review, research, and Office Action responses. This can improve margins, particularly on fixed-fee matters.

Maintain quality controls

Apply firm drafting standards and repeatable checks while attorneys retain responsibility for the final work product.

Reallocate attorney time

Use less attorney time for production work and more for claim strategy, client counsel, and business development.

One Am Law 100 firm completed a patent project in 20 hours instead of an estimated 100, saving 80 attorney hours.

~$38K
more margin on one Am Law 100 patent project
20%
less application drafting time at Young Basile
55%
of Am Law 100 firms use Patlytics

Trusted by leading firms including Quinn Emanuel, McDermott Will & Emery, Foley & Lardner, Holland & Knight, Nixon Peabody, Brown Rudnick, and others.

Structure inventor input before drafting

Raw inventor context  →  complete disclosure
  • Turn slides, abstracts, transcripts, and technical materials into structured invention disclosures
  • Generate patent-ready figures from sketches and source materials
  • Let Agent identify missing detail and prompt for the information needed before drafting starts

Reduce the time attorneys spend organizing inventor materials before drafting begins.

Figure editor

Evaluate claim strategy before drafting

Disclosure  →  claim strategy
  • Evaluate the invention against prior art before committing to claim scope
  • Build and compare claim trees from the disclosure
  • Identify the elements most likely to carry novelty and defensibility
  • Test alternate claim formulations before they create downstream drafting and prosecution rework

Identify potential claim and prior-art issues before they create additional drafting or prosecution work.

Claims — as filed

1. A knitted component for an article of footwear, comprising an outer layer (202) and an inner layer.

2. The knitted component of claim 1, wherein the outer layer includes a fused area (204).

3. The knitted component of claim 2, wherein the fused area is water-resistant.

4. The knitted component of claim 3, further comprising raised dimensional structures (206).

Reducing production time increases attorney capacity.
Across drafting, review, research, and prosecution

Reduce time required to produce the first draft

Source material  →  review-ready draft

Patlytics generates application drafts using the invention disclosure, relevant prior art, and your firm’s drafting preferences. Attorneys review and refine the application rather than building the first draft manually.

  • Apply firm templates and drafting standards to the first pass
  • Run validity, §112, infringement, and freedom-to-operate checks against the draft
  • Trace claim interpretations back to the specification and revise language before filing

Reduce the time spent producing and reworking the initial draft.

Draft editor
Young Basile cut patent application drafting time by 20%.
Andrew Basile  ·  President, Young Basile  ·  Read the case study
145M+
Patents Worldwide
300M+
NPL Works
99%+
Verbatim Accuracy

Reduce time spent on draft review and cleanup

Draft  →  filing-ready work product
  • Flag inconsistent terminology, undefined terms, and claim-dependency errors before final proofreading
  • Check generated content against the disclosure, figures, technical materials, and related sources
  • Apply firm-specific drafting standards consistently across attorneys, offices, and matter teams
  • Edit claims and specification collaboratively, with Agent available to test the draft against those standards

Give senior attorneys a more complete draft for review, reducing time spent on structural and consistency edits.

Drafting standard check
“Processes that previously took several days to months now take just hours.”
Asahi Kasei  ·  Read the case study

Reduce Office Action response time

Rejection  →  response
  • Drop in the Office Action, pending claims, and specification; Patlytics retrieves cited references and assembles the record
  • Use Agent & Skills to test cited art against individual claims and limitations and identify where the examiner’s reasoning is vulnerable
  • See how similar patents were prosecuted and how the examiner handled previous cases before choosing an argument or amendment
  • Develop and edit arguments and amendments in real time beside the Office Action, cited art, claims, and specification

Reduce time spent assembling and cross-referencing the prosecution record so attorneys can focus on arguments, amendments, and client decisions.

Office actions
Office action response time cut by 80%.
Patlytics customer data  ·  another place to return attorney hours to the practice

Built for Dickinson Wright · Disclosure → Patentability → Drafting → Review → Office Actions

Increase prosecution capacity with fewer attorney hours per matter.