January 20, 2026

How Patlytics Powers Global Patent Workflows Across Europe, Asia, and the United States

How Patlytics Powers Global Patent Workflows Across Europe, Asia, and the United States

As patent portfolios become increasingly global, IP teams face a growing challenge: managing multi-jurisdictional patent search, analysis, and prosecution across Europe, Asia, and the United States, often using fragmented tools that don’t speak the same legal nor linguistic language.

Patlytics is built to solve this problem. The platform integrates European (EP), Asian (JP, KR, TW, CN), WIPO, and U.S. patent data into a single AI-native workspace, enabling faster search, clearer analysis, and consistent prosecution workflows across borders.

Whether you’re responding to a European Patent Office (EPO) Office Action, building claim charts against Japanese or Korean patents, or preparing USPTO-compliant filings from non-English source materials, Patlytics provides a unified system designed for international patent practice.

International Patent Support in One Unified Platform

Patlytics provides dedicated international functionality tailored for major jurisdictions including Europe (EP/EPO), Japan (JP), South Korea (KR), Taiwan (TW), China (CN), WIPO (PCT), and the United States (USPTO).

By integrating multi-jurisdictional patent data, translations, and legal frameworks into one platform, Patlytics eliminates the need for siloed tools and manual cross-referencing.

European Patent (EP) Functions

EP Office Action Support

Users can upload European Office Actions to perform structured rejection analysis, develop strategy notes, and draft responses using the same streamlined workflow used for USPTO Office Actions. This allows teams handling both U.S. and European prosecution to work consistently across jurisdictions.

Comprehensive EPC Coverage

The platform supports analysis across all European Patent Convention (EPC) articles, including Article 76 (divisional applications and added matter) and other substantive EPC provisions relevant to European prosecution strategy

EP Search and Evidence Linking

Patlytics supports searching and preloading EP patents and enhanced citation pinning, allowing users to link specific evidence directly to original European patent references

This enables precise, defensible analysis aligned with EPO standards.

Asian Patent Coverage: JP, KR, TW, and CN

Patlytics provides deep support for major Asian patent jurisdictions, with a focus on searchability, evidence discovery, and language accuracy.

Jurisdiction-Specific Search

The platform supports native searching and preloading for: Japan (JP), South Korea (KR), and Taiwan (TW), enabling teams to work directly with jurisdiction-specific data..

Taiwan (TW) Patent Support

Users can:

  • Build claim charts
  • Perform structured analysis
  • Use Taiwanese patents directly within enforcement, invalidity, or portfolio workflows
Chinese (CN) Patent & Evidence Support

Patlytics supports Chinese-language evidence discovery, including:

  • Crawling Chinese-language sources in Detection Reports
  • Identifying evidence of use from CN-language materials

This is particularly valuable for infringement analysis involving Chinese products or suppliers.

Korean (KR) Patent Analysis

For Korean patents, Patlytics:

  • Supports claim charting against KR patents
  • Displays the original Korean source language side-by-side with English translations

This ensures machine translation does not distort claim meaning or legal analysis.

Multilingual and Universal Capabilities for Global Teams

Patlytics includes powerful cross-border tools designed for international collaboration.

Universal Translation Support

Users can configure claim charts to view English translations of foreign-language patents or product documentation and toggle between translated text and original source language

Global Jurisdiction Targeting

In Detection Reports and Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis, users can specify:

  • Jurisdiction of sale
  • Language of product documentation
  • Target regions for infringement or clearance analysis
WIPO (PCT) Support

The platform supports searching WIPO (PCT) patents and building claim charts against WIPO publications.

Enhanced Citation Pinning Across Jurisdictions

Beyond U.S. patents, Patlytics supports pinpoint citation navigation for: EP, JP, KR, and TW.

Users are automatically taken to the exact page and paragraph of foreign patent references, dramatically reducing manual review time.

A Bridge for International Teams Working with U.S. Patents

For international users handling U.S. patents, Patlytics acts as a comprehensive bridge by combining:

  • USPTO-specific legal logic
  • Automated translation
  • U.S.-compliant drafting and formatting
US-Specific Legal Frameworks

Patlytics includes a dedicated U.S. Prior Art Qualification Engine, helping users assess whether a reference qualifies as prior art under U.S. law.

Key capabilities include: Pre-AIA vs. AIA classification and Initial Section 102 analysis, including sub-sections such as: 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2).

This is critical for invalidity analysis, PTAB filings, and litigation strategy.

Comprehensive US Office Action Prosecution

For global teams responding to the USPTO, Patlytics automates key prosecution steps.

Automated Reference Fetching

The system:

  • Parses U.S. Office Actions
  • Identifies cited references
  • Automatically fetches full U.S. patent texts into the workspace
USPTO-Compliant Drafting

Patlytics applies standard U.S. formatting, including underlines for additions and strikethroughs for deletions

Expert AI Guidance

Drafting workflows leverage prompts instructing the AI to act as an experienced U.S. patent attorney, ensuring outputs reflect U.S. prosecution norms.

Multilingual Support for US-Facing Work

International teams working with non-English materials can:

  • Analyze foreign-language Office Actions
  • Develop strategy notes in one environment
  • Review side-by-side translations to prevent misinterpretation
US-Compliant Application Drafting

Patlytics automates strict USPTO requirements for international applicants.

Key features include:

  • USPTO-standard formatting
  • Automated section headers and paragraph numbering
  • Source Material Audits to ensure disclosures include required technical fields and embodiments before drafting
Extensive US Patent Data Integration

The platform is built on comprehensive U.S. data to maximize speed and accuracy.

  • Complete indexing of every U.S. patent
  • Fast search across 70 million patents
  • Filters for: Priority dates and Pre-AIA vs. AIA status

One Platform for Global Patent Strategy

From European prosecution to Asian evidence discovery to USPTO-compliant drafting, Patlytics enables IP teams to manage global patent work in a single, AI-powered environment.

For organizations operating across jurisdictions, this unified approach reduces translation risk, improves legal consistency, accelerates cross-border analysis, and eliminates fragmented tooling.

To see how Patlytics supports international patent workflows across EP, JP, KR, TW, CN, WIPO, and the United States, book a demo today.

Reduce cycle times. Increase margins. Deliver winning IP outcomes.

The Premier AI-Powered 
Patent Platform

Sanofi
Nixon Peabody LLP
Holland & Knight LLP
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Brown Rudnick LLP
Supertab, Inc.
Nissan Motor, Co. Ltd.
Grail, Inc.
Foresight Valuation Group
Becker Transactions LLC
Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing PLLC
Jasco Products Company LLC
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP
AUO Corporation
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.
Asahi Kasei
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Abnormal Security
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Maschoff Brennan Gilmore Israelsen & Mauriel LLP
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
Richardson Oliver Law Group LLP
Foley & Lardner LLP
Susman Godfrey LLP
Sanofi
Nixon Peabody LLP
Holland & Knight LLP
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Brown Rudnick LLP
Supertab, Inc.
Nissan Motor, Co. Ltd.
Grail, Inc.
Foresight Valuation Group
Becker Transactions LLC
Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing PLLC
Jasco Products Company LLC
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP
AUO Corporation
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.
Asahi Kasei
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Abnormal Security
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Maschoff Brennan Gilmore Israelsen & Mauriel LLP
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
Richardson Oliver Law Group LLP
Foley & Lardner LLP
Susman Godfrey LLP
Sanofi
Nixon Peabody LLP
Holland & Knight LLP
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Brown Rudnick LLP
Supertab, Inc.
Nissan Motor, Co. Ltd.
Grail, Inc.
Foresight Valuation Group
Becker Transactions LLC
Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing PLLC
Jasco Products Company LLC
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP
AUO Corporation
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.
Asahi Kasei
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Abnormal Security
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Maschoff Brennan Gilmore Israelsen & Mauriel LLP
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
Richardson Oliver Law Group LLP
Foley & Lardner LLP
Susman Godfrey LLP
Sanofi
Nixon Peabody LLP
Holland & Knight LLP
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
Brown Rudnick LLP
Supertab, Inc.
Nissan Motor, Co. Ltd.
Grail, Inc.
Foresight Valuation Group
Becker Transactions LLC
Ahmad, Zavitsanos & Mensing PLLC
Jasco Products Company LLC
Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth LLP
AUO Corporation
Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc.
Asahi Kasei
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Abnormal Security
Caldwell Cassady & Curry
Maschoff Brennan Gilmore Israelsen & Mauriel LLP
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Reichman Jorgensen Lehman & Feldberg LLP
Richardson Oliver Law Group LLP
Foley & Lardner LLP
Susman Godfrey LLP